<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Environmental Performance Rankings Announced in Davos</title>
	<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2008/01/23/global-environmental-performance-rankings-announced-in-davos/</link>
	<description>The Blog that Talks about Climate Change</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2008/01/23/global-environmental-performance-rankings-announced-in-davos/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2008/01/23/global-environmental-performance-rankings-announced-in-davos/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree that looking at the study in detail it would be easy to undermine some of the findings and make some criticism of the methodology. 

But I think it is not bad as an indicator when one understands the limitations of the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree that looking at the study in detail it would be easy to undermine some of the findings and make some criticism of the methodology. </p>
<p>But I think it is not bad as an indicator when one understands the limitations of the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClimateHeretic</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2008/01/23/global-environmental-performance-rankings-announced-in-davos/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>ClimateHeretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2008/01/23/global-environmental-performance-rankings-announced-in-davos/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Well written article Mark, good job, too bad the Yale study that is the subject matter appears to be at first look "inconsistent".

I will reserve final judgement until I look through the data and rating formulas and missing data assumptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written article Mark, good job, too bad the Yale study that is the subject matter appears to be at first look &#8220;inconsistent&#8221;.</p>
<p>I will reserve final judgement until I look through the data and rating formulas and missing data assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
