Fly Green with Virgin Biofuels


 jet engine

Billionaire, entrepreneur, serial adventurer and airline owner Richard Branson is the man behind an innovation which may take the sting out of one of climate change’s biggest sins.

Next month a Virgin Atlantic Boeing 747 will make the world’s first biofuel powered flight between London and Amsterdam. Testing a blend of 80% conventional aviation fuel and 20% biofuel the test promises to pave the way to a future low carbon airline industry. The flight follows Branson’s announcement last year of a $3 billion investment program to develop renewable energy for transport.

With no feasible alternative to the jet engine Branson’s initiative will be warmly welcomed by those who have found it difficult to avoid long haul travel.

But TalkClimateChange hates biofuels, right?

Right.

However, the Virgin 747 will use a specially developed biofuel which according to a Virgin spokesman is fully sustainable and, critically, will not compete with food or freshwater resources.

Virgin and its partners are currently keeping quiet about the exact nature and source of this fuel, although it has been suggested that it may have been developed from marine algae. Should such a fuel prove to be viable then we may be looking at a major step forwards in the reduction of Co2 emissions. Biofuels that can be produced on a scale sufficient to satisfy the huge demands of the airline industry might feasibly be used in the auto industry at the same time, alleviating many of the problems caused by today’s biofuels.

This news comes at the same time as the EU have announced a ban on certain types of biofuel following criticism of the fuel’s negative environmental and social impacts.

Virgin have previously initiated other common sense emissions reduction initiatives. Last year Virgin calculated that an aircraft creates at least 10 tons of unnecessary Co2 emissions annually during taxiing and whilst waiting for take-off. Since then Virgin planes at Heathrow airport have been towed from their parking spaces to the runway.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Wresting With Climate Change Fatigue
EU vs Business, Red Team vs Green Team

Tags


Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Reader Comments

Great so how much less CO2 does the new fuel produce in actual emissions?

Nothing. Darn that is bad news.

This closed CO2 loop justification is a whole bunch of nonesense as it does nothing for the goal of GHG reductions, if anything it may increase GHG emissions, but logically if all fuel came from biomass the CO2 level should stay relatively constant.

The refining process must be considered as well. Yet I am sure if Richard Bransen says it is ok, then it is. Just like his concern for the environment stopped him from expanding his aviation business to North America, oh wait that did not stop him.

So we cover the oceans with algae to meet our energy demands, sounds like a plan to me.

Hmmm, not much effect, I think.

Ethanol in the US has an EROEI of about 38%. So it produces 1/1.38 = 72% as much emissions.

Thus 80% avgas + 20% ethanol would give us,

80 + 20×0.72 = 94% as much emissions as avgas alone.

Probably it’s easier just not to fly. Unless of course it’s nothing about being environmentally-friendly, and everything about… marketing.