How does IPCC arrive at all oceans with rising levels?

It does it by cooking the books.

The following is from Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner the head of the
Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics department at
Stockholm University in Sweden.

Then, in 2003, the same data set, which in [IPCC’s]
publications, in their website, was a straight line–
suddenly it changed, and showed a very strong line
of uplift, 2.3 mm per year, the same as from the tide
gauge. And that didn’t look so nice. It looked as
though they had recorded something; but they hadn’t
recorded anything. It was the original one which they
had suddenly twisted up, because they entered a
“correction factor,” which they took from the tide
gauge. So it was not a measured thing, but a figure
introduced from outside. I accused them of this at the
Academy of Sciences in Moscow –I said you have
introduced factors from outside; it’s not a
measurement. It looks like it is measured from the
satellite, but you don’t say what really happened. And
they answered, that we had to do it, because
otherwise we would not have gotten any trend!

Since both terrorism and sea-level rise as a result of AGW are based on the same fear-driven psychology, there are several parallels that can be extracted.

Terrorism works because it instills a sense of vulnerability to the targets as a result of the uncertainity and potential for harm it represents, the underlying message is that you can be affected unless you take steps to protect yourself (in this case relinquish personal freedoms and rights) and vigilently inform on activity that is suspicious.

The fear of sea-level rise is based upon the exact same principal. Is the next step in the process the reduction of your economic liberties and the reporting of suspicious emission activities?

IMO the UN thinks so.

I won’t mention the Danish Hitler by name, but he raises a good point that rather than extreme weather events having increased in severity or frequency in recent years, the problem is more that increases in wealth and focus on tourism-led development have led to greater <> costs.

Hence keen interest from the ABI in the UK, particularly after this summer but they have actually been actively engaging with climate change for much longer.

Please clarify whether by “increased dramatically” you mean frequency and severity, or economic cost.

Please cite a source for this claim.

The last interglacial was different in several contexts to the present, not least of which is the more extreme warming of Greenland which is estimated to be 3 to 5 degrees C warmer than present.