<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Change - who is right and are we wrong?</title>
	<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/</link>
	<description>The Blog that Talks about Climate Change</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate change alarmism again &#124; TalkClimateChange</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate change alarmism again &#124; TalkClimateChange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>[...] we mentioned in our piece on climate extremism and on the rights and wrongs of the climate change argument, there are those who do no favours to their point of view through [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] we mentioned in our piece on climate extremism and on the rights and wrongs of the climate change argument, there are those who do no favours to their point of view through [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hypography Science Forums - Co2 Acquittal</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypography Science Forums - Co2 Acquittal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] section, I'd suggest they're not as &#34;fair and balanced&#34; as one might presume.   Climate Change - who is right and we are wrong? &#124; TalkClimateChange   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] section, I&#8217;d suggest they&#8217;re not as &quot;fair and balanced&quot; as one might presume.   Climate Change - who is right and we are wrong? | TalkClimateChange   [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate extremists – please keep it real &#124; TalkClimateChange</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate extremists – please keep it real &#124; TalkClimateChange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>[...] see evidence of such problems in the ongoing battle that is being fought between rival scientific camps, each claiming that the other side has made fundamental errors or omitted important data. In this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] see evidence of such problems in the ongoing battle that is being fought between rival scientific camps, each claiming that the other side has made fundamental errors or omitted important data. In this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>“Politicians should state their honest intentions”.

I know. We are inclined to be a little naive or idealistic at times. But the point remains that we should push for more transparency on green politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Politicians should state their honest intentions”.</p>
<p>I know. We are inclined to be a little naive or idealistic at times. But the point remains that we should push for more transparency on green politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metyu</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Metyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I thought this a brilliant analysis until I read "Politicians should state their honest intentions".

Then, I must admit, I burst out laughing... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this a brilliant analysis until I read &#8220;Politicians should state their honest intentions&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then, I must admit, I burst out laughing&#8230; <img src='http://www.talkclimatechange.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClimateHeretic</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>ClimateHeretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>FYI: Ernst-Georg Beck Dipl. Biol. is a Biology and Bio-Technology Professor from the Merian-Schule. Which is a "High-School" in German, but would be the equivilent of a Vocational College here in North America, and happens to be a school for Women. He is also the author of a paper on CO2 measurements and concentration re-construction.

Just for transparency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: Ernst-Georg Beck Dipl. Biol. is a Biology and Bio-Technology Professor from the Merian-Schule. Which is a &#8220;High-School&#8221; in German, but would be the equivilent of a Vocational College here in North America, and happens to be a school for Women. He is also the author of a paper on CO2 measurements and concentration re-construction.</p>
<p>Just for transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>FYI, not only are a substantial majority of those signers not climate scientists, some of them aren't even scientists.  Dipl. Beck, e.g., is a high school teacher.  

By the way, on the egregiously wrong "no warming since 1998" claim, see &lt;a href="http://tamino.wordpress.com/2007/12/16/wiggles/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, not only are a substantial majority of those signers not climate scientists, some of them aren&#8217;t even scientists.  Dipl. Beck, e.g., is a high school teacher.  </p>
<p>By the way, on the egregiously wrong &#8220;no warming since 1998&#8243; claim, see <a href="http://tamino.wordpress.com/2007/12/16/wiggles/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.talkclimatechange.com/2007/12/17/climate-change-who-is-right-and-we-are-wrong/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Nice job. A reasoned, honest approach. There seems to be so few of us these days who are willing to say, "You know what, I just don't know."

Having a limited understanding of the world around us is a defining characteristic of the human experience. For some reason our cultures have steered away from that basic humility and now everyone is required to be "in the know" about everything. It is perfectly reasonable to admit confusion and uncertainty about a topic, and a far smarter thing to do than to bodly proclaim the "science is done"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job. A reasoned, honest approach. There seems to be so few of us these days who are willing to say, &#8220;You know what, I just don&#8217;t know.&#8221;</p>
<p>Having a limited understanding of the world around us is a defining characteristic of the human experience. For some reason our cultures have steered away from that basic humility and now everyone is required to be &#8220;in the know&#8221; about everything. It is perfectly reasonable to admit confusion and uncertainty about a topic, and a far smarter thing to do than to bodly proclaim the &#8220;science is done&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
